DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-049
CURRENT DD-214
RELIEF REQUESTED
RELIEF GRANTED
BY DRB
ADMIN
CORRECTIONS
TIS 3 yrs, 9 months,1 da
Policy Implications __| None
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6A, JHJ, Unsatisfactory Performance, RE4
RE-1
None
None
The applicant was discharged for Unsatisfactory Performance in the Spring of March 2010. After reporting to a
new assignment in the summer of 2008, the applicant was placed on performance probation in the Spring of
2009 for failing to meet the basic qualifications and fitness standards as a Boat Crew Member. The applicant
was given three opportunities to meet these requirements thereafter. Additionally, the applicant was afforded
personalized mentoring to improve performance, but chose not to seek any remedial measures, or to improve
the bad attitude. The applicant was also formerly counseled by the Chief Petty Officers Mess in the summer of
2009 to show support, prompt motivation, indicate shortcomings and the impact it could have on a future with
the Coast Guard.
When notified of command’s intent to discharge him in late 2009, the member waived the right to an attorney,
did not object to discharge, and declined to make a statement. The applicant has not provided any new
supporting documentation for the Board. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 074
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2012-074 E3 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6A, 12.B.11, JFV, Condition, Not a Disability, Change RE code and Narrative Reason None Amend the Separation Authority to the legacy Personnel Manual (COMDTINST M1000.6A) Article 12.B.12. The lack of performance was evident from 2007-2009 in which two unsatisfactory conduct evaluations and five separate non-recommendations for advancement were documented and issued. The applicant provided no evidence to refute...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 047
The applicant was counseled and taken to NJP for larceny in the Spring of 2001. Therefore, the board recommends relief based on the consistency of these separations, and noting that the JKN code was established to separate individuals for a pattern of misconduct stemming solely from minor disciplinary infractions. Also of note, from an administrative standpoint, the board notes the inconsistency of the applicant’s Entry Into Service Date on the DD-214 worksheet.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 055
The following provides an outline of the approval process and the notable findings: Applicant’s command: Made separation notification after just 3 months on performance probation. The current application requests to remove the Narrative Reason (NR) as ‘Unacceptable Conduct’, and to amend it to a Voluntary Separation that is in alignment with SPD code KND with an NR of Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons. EPM separation approval (summary): In the summer of 2013, the Discharge was...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 058
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-058 NAME CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, None Stated, JNC, Unacceptable Conduct, RE4 RELIEF REQUESTED | Upgrade RE code, SPD code, and Narrative Reason RELIEF GRANTED None BY DRB ADMIN None CORRECTIONS TIS | 1 yr, 11 months, 11 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Unacceptable Conduct in the summer of 2001, due to tardiness on several occasions, unsatisfactory grooming, substandard duty performance,...
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 093
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2012-093 TIS 3 yrs, 9 months, 19 days Policy Implications | None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: During the applicant’s 3 years and 9 months of service, the applicant’s record shows receipt of several negative administrative entries related to dereliction of duties and insubordination. The assigned SPD code and narrative reason issued in early 2006 are proper. Propriety: Discharge was proper.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 015
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-015 TIS 5 yrs, 3 months, 9 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct due to making False Official Statements, substandard performance, and an attempt to compromise an End of Course Test. Removal of the scratch paper would have resulted in a test compromise. Applicant was reduced to Pay Grade E-2 as a result of this NJP.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 063
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant was given an Honorable Discharge and the most favorable Narrative Reason for separation. Administrative change will be made to the correct Separation Authority to COMDTINST M1000.4, Art.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 051
SECCEN followed up in late 2006 to indicate that no improvement had been made to eliminate the sizable debt that the applicant had created over a significant amount of time. Additionally, the command formally counseled applicant on the need to change their rating for retention in the service. Discharge: No change | 25.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 017
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-017 TIS 4 yrs, 8 months, 1 da Policy Implications EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged due to a Personality Disorder diagnosis. Soon after, the applicant was notified of the command’s discharge intent. Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 060
Thereafter, the applicant was formally evaluated each month on the progress to reach the desired performance expectations. Upon receiving notification of the discharge in 2008, the applicant objected to the discharge and was given an opportunity to speak on their behalf. Therefore, a separation summary may list the aforementioned Personnel Manual’s 12-B- 12 with Convenience of the Government in the Article/law or Separation Authority, but it is not to be substituted, or used synonymously...